| Candida Infections |  | | September 4, 2009 |  |
| | From Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections Among HIV-Exposed and HIV-Infected Children. National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Vol. 58, No. RR-4. September 4, 2009. |  | | Epidemiology |  | The most common fungal infections among HIV-infected children are caused by Candida spp. Oral thrush and diaper dermatitis occur among 50%-85% of HIV-infected children. Candida albicans is the most common cause of mucosal and esophageal candidiasis. Localized disease caused by Candida is characterized by limited tissue invasion to the skin or mucosa. Examples of localized candidiasis include oropharyngeal and esophageal disease, vulvovaginitis, and diaper dermatitis. Once the organism penetrates the mucosal surface and widespread hematogenous dissemination occurs, invasive candidiasis ensues. This can result in candidemia, meningitis, endocarditis, renal disease, endophthalmitis, and hepatosplenic disease. Oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) continues to be one of the most frequent OIs in HIV-infected children during the HAART era (28% of children), with an incidence rate of 0.93 per 100 child-years (3Gona P, Van Dyke RB, Williams PL, et al. Incidence of opportunistic and other infections in HIV-infected children in the HAART era. JAMA 2006;296:292-300.). The incidence of esophageal or tracheobronchial candidiasis also has decreased from 1.2 per 100 child-years during the pre-HAART era to 0.08 per 100 child-years during the HAART era (2001-2004) (1Dankner WM, Lindsey JC, Levin MJ, et al. Correlates of opportunistic infections in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus managed before highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:40-8.). Candida esophagitis continues to be seen in children who are not responding to antiretroviral therapy (266Chiou CC, Groll AH, Gonzalez CE, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in pediatric acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: clinical manifestations and risk factors. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:729-34., 267Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:900-6.). Children who develop esophageal candidiasis despite HAART may be less likely to have typical symptoms (e.g., odynophagia and retrosternal pain) or have concomitant OPC (268Chiou CC, Groll AH, Mavrogiorgos N, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pediatric patients after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:388-92.); during the pre-HAART era, concomitant OPC occurred in 94% of children with candida esophagitis (266Chiou CC, Groll AH, Gonzalez CE, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in pediatric acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: clinical manifestations and risk factors. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:729-34.). Risk factors for esophageal candidiasis include low CD4 count (<100 cells/ mm3), high viral load, and neutropenia (<500 cells/mm3) (1Dankner WM, Lindsey JC, Levin MJ, et al. Correlates of opportunistic infections in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus managed before highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:40-8., 3Gona P, Van Dyke RB, Williams PL, et al. Incidence of opportunistic and other infections in HIV-infected children in the HAART era. JAMA 2006;296:292-300., 266Chiou CC, Groll AH, Gonzalez CE, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in pediatric acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: clinical manifestations and risk factors. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:729-34., 267Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:900-6.). Disseminated candidiasis is infrequent among HIV-infected children, but Candida can disseminate from the esophagus particularly when coinfection with herpes simplex virus (HSV) or CMV is present (228Leibovitz E, Rigaud M, Chandwani S, et al. Disseminated fungal infections in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:888-94., 266Chiou CC, Groll AH, Gonzalez CE, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in pediatric acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: clinical manifestations and risk factors. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:729-34.). Candidemia occurs in up to 12% of HIV-infected children with chronically indwelling central venous catheters for total parental nutrition or IV antibiotics (267Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:900-6., 269Gonzalez CE, Venzon D, Lee S, et al. Risk factors for fungemia in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:515-21.). Approximately 50% of reported cases of Candida bloodstream infections in HIV-infected children are caused by non-albicansCandida spp., including C. tropicalis, C. pseudotropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, C. kruse, and C. dubliniensis. In one study of Cambodian HIV-infected children on HAART who had candidiasis, seven (75%) of nine isolated C. glabrata were resistant to fluconazole, and three (40%) of seven C. parapsilosis isolated were resistant to more than three azole agents (270Krcmery V, Augustinova A, Babelova O, et al. Fungal resistance in Cambodian children with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:470.). Species-specific epidemiology varies widely by geographic location and hospital. A substantial number of children who develop candidemia have received systemically absorbed oral antifungal azole compounds (e.g., ketoconazole or fluconazole) for control of oral and esophageal candidiasis (267Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:900-6.). Early detection and treatment of candidemia can decrease mortality. Overall mortality was 90% in one study in children who had >14 days of fever and symptoms before diagnosis of disseminated infection with Candida spp. (228Leibovitz E, Rigaud M, Chandwani S, et al. Disseminated fungal infections in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:888-94.). |
 | | Clinical Manifestations |  | Clinical manifestations of OPC vary and include pseudomembranous (thrush) and erythematous (atrophic), hyperplastic (hypertrophic), and angular cheilitis. Thrush appears as creamy white curdlike patches with inflamed underlying mucosa that is exposed after removal of the exudate. It can be found on the oropharyngeal mucosa, palate, and tonsils. Erythematous OPC is characterized by flat erythematous lesions on the mucosal surface. Hyperplastic candidiasis comprises raised white plaques on the lower surface of the tongue, palate, and buccal mucosa and cannot be removed. Angular cheilitis occurs as red fissured lesions in the corners of the mouth. Esophageal candidiasis often presents with odynophagia, dysphagia, or retrosternal pain, and unlike adults, a substantial number of children experience nausea and vomiting. Therefore, children with esophageal candidiasis might present with dehydration and weight loss. Evidence of OPC can be absent among children with esophageal candidiasis, particularly those receiving HAART. New-onset fever in an HIV-infected child with advanced disease and a central venous catheter is the most common clinical manifestation of candidemia. Renal candidiasis presents with candiduria and ultrasonographically demonstrated renal parenchymal lesions, often without symptoms related to renal disease (267Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:900-6.). Candidemia can lead to endogenous endophthalmitis, and ocular examination by an ophthalmologist is warranted in children with bloodstream Candida infection. |
 | | Diagnosis |  | Oral candidiasis can be diagnosed by a potassium hydroxide preparation and culture with microscopic demonstration of budding yeast cells in wet mounts or biopsy specimens. For recurrent or refractory OPC, cultures with in vitro susceptibility testing can be used to guide antifungal treatment (271Muller FM, Groll AH, Walsh TJ. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections in children infected with human immuno deficiency virus. Eur J Pediatr 1999;158:187-99.). Esophageal candidiasis has a classic cobblestoning appearance on barium swallow. In refractory symptomatic cases, endoscopy should be performed to rule out other causes of refractory esophagitis (e.g., HSV, CMV, MAC, and azole-resistant Candida spp.). Endoscopy might show few small white raised plaques to elevated confluent plaques with hyperemia and extensive ulceration. Candidemia is best diagnosed with blood cultures using lysis-centrifugation techniques (267Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:900-6.) or automated broth-based systems (272Stevens D. Diagnosis of fungal infections: current status. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002;49(Suppl 1):11-9.). When candidemia is present, depending on clinical suspicions, retinal examination for endophthalmitis, abdominal CT or ultrasound for hepatic or renal involvement, and bone scans for osteomyelitis can be considered. New diagnostic techniques such as the urine D-arabinitol/ L-arabinitol ratio (273Sigmundsdottir G, Larsson L, Wiebe T, et al. Clinical experience of urine D-arabinitol/L-arabinitol ratio in the early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in paediatric high risk populations. Scand J Infect Dis 2007;39:146-51.), serum D-arabinitol/creatinine ratio (274Yeo SF, Huie S, Sofair AN, et al. Measurement of serum D-arabinitol/ creatinine ratios for initial diagnosis and for predicting outcome in an unselected, population-based sample of patients with Candida fungemia. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:3894-9.), Candida antigen mannan (277Klingspor L, Jalal S. Molecular detection and identification of Candida and Aspergillus spp. from clinical samples using real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:745-53.), (1Dankner WM, Lindsey JC, Levin MJ, et al. Correlates of opportunistic infections in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus managed before highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:40-8., 3Gona P, Van Dyke RB, Williams PL, et al. Incidence of opportunistic and other infections in HIV-infected children in the HAART era. JAMA 2006;296:292-300.)-beta-D-gulcan assay (276Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Alexander BD, Kett DH, et al. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the (1->3) beta-D-glucan assay as an aid to diagnosis of fungal infections in humans. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:654-9.), and real time PCR (277Klingspor L, Jalal S. Molecular detection and identification of Candida and Aspergillus spp. from clinical samples using real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:745-53.) are promising diagnostic alternatives under development for early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in children, but none of these assays have been validated for use in children. |
 | | Discontinuing Primary Prophylaxi |  | Not applicable. |
 | | Treatment Recommendations |  |  | | Treatment of Disease |  | | |
 | | Oropharyngeal candidiasis |  | Early, uncomplicated infection can be effectively treated with topical therapy using clotrimazole troches or oral polyenes (such as nystatin or amphotericin B suspension) (BII) (279Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:662-78.). Troches should not be used in infants (DIII). Resistance to clotrimazole can develop as a consequence of previous exposure to clotrimazole itself or to other azole drugs; resistance correlates with refractory mucosal candidiasis (280Pelletier R, Peter J, Antin C, et al. Emergence of resistance of Candida albicans to clotrimazole in human immunodeficiency virusinfected children: in vitro and clinical correlations. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1563-8.). Systemic therapy with one of the oral azoles (e.g., fluconazole, ketoconazole, or itraconazole) also is effective for initial treatment of OPC (281Pons V, Greenspan D, Debruin M. Therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: a randomized, prospective multicenter study of oral fluconazole versus clotrimazole troches. The Multicenter Study Group. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1993;6:1311-6., 282Pons V, Greenspan D, Lozada-Nur F, et al. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS: randomized comparison of fluconazole versus nystatin oral suspensions. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:1204-7.). Oral fluconazole is more effective than nystatin suspension for initial treatment of OPC in infants; is easier to administer to children than the topical therapies; and is the recommended treatment if systemic therapy is used (AI) (281Pons V, Greenspan D, Debruin M. Therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: a randomized, prospective multicenter study of oral fluconazole versus clotrimazole troches. The Multicenter Study Group. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1993;6:1311-6., 283Goins RA, Ascher D, Waecker N, et al. Comparison of fluconazole and nystatin oral suspensions for treatment of oral candidiasis in infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:1165-7.). Itraconazole solution has comparable efficacy to fluconazole and can be used to treat OPC, although it is less well tolerated than fluconazole (AI) (284Phillips P, de Beule K, Frechette G, et al. A double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole capsules for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1368-73.). Gastric acid enhances absorption of itraconazole solution; itraconazole solution should be taken without food when possible. Itraconazole capsules and oral solution should not be used interchangeably because, at the same dose, drug exposure is greater with the oral solution than with capsules and absorption of the capsule formulation varies. Ketoconazole absorption also varies, and therefore neither itraconazole capsules nor ketoconazole are recommended for treating OPC if fluconazole or itraconazole solutions are available (DII). |
 | | Esophageal disease |  | Systemic therapy is essential for esophageal disease (AI) and should be initiated empirically among HIV-infected children who have OPC and esophageal symptoms. In most patients, symptoms should resolve within days after the start of effective therapy. Oral or IV fluconazole or oral itraconazole solutions, administered for 14-21 days, are highly effective for treatment of Candida esophagitis (AI) (285Wilcox CM, Darouiche RO, Laine L, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole tablets in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. J infect Dis 1997;176:227-32.). For treatment of OPC, ketoconazole and itraconazole capsules are not recommended because of variable absorption and lower efficacy (DII). Voriconazole, a newer azole antifungal, or caspofungin, an echinocandin inhibitor of fungal (1Dankner WM, Lindsey JC, Levin MJ, et al. Correlates of opportunistic infections in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus managed before highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:40-8., 3Gona P, Van Dyke RB, Williams PL, et al. Incidence of opportunistic and other infections in HIV-infected children in the HAART era. JAMA 2006;296:292-300.)-beta-D-glucan synthetase that must be administered intravenously because of limited bioavailability, also are effective in treating esophageal candidiasis in HIV-infected adults (BI) (286Mora-Duarte J, Betts R, Rotstein C, et al. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:2020-9., 287Walsh TJ. Echinocandins-an advance in the primary treatment of invasive candidiasis N Engl J Med 2002;347:2070-2., 288Deresinski SC, Stevens DA. Caspofungin. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:1445-57.), but there is little experience with use of these drugs in children. Voriconazole has been used in a limited number of children without HIV infection to treat invasive fungal infections, including esophageal candidiasis or candidemia (251Walsh TJ, Lutsar I, Driscoll T, et al. Voriconazole in the treatment of aspergillosis, scedosporiosis and other invasive fungal infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:240-8., 268Chiou CC, Groll AH, Mavrogiorgos N, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pediatric patients after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:388-92.). Usually children have been initiated on voriconazole intravenously and then switched to oral administration to complete therapy after stabilization. The optimal pediatric dose of voriconazole is not yet known; children require higher doses (on a mg/kg body weight basis) than do adults to attain similar serum concentrations of voriconazole. The recommended voriconazole dosage for children is 6-8 mg/kg intravenously or 8 mg/kg orally every 12 hours (AII) (252Scott LJ, Simpson D. Voriconazole: a review of its use in the management of invasive fungal infections. Drugs 2007;67:269-98., 253Walsh TJ, Karlsson MO, Driscoll T, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous voriconazole in children after single- or multiple-dose administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:2166-72.). A pharmacokinetic study of caspofungin in immunocompromised children aged 2-17 years without HIV infection demonstrated that 50 mg/m2 body surface area/day (70 mg/day maximum) provides comparable exposure to that obtained in adults receiving a standard 50-mg daily regimen (256Walsh TJ, Adamson PC, Seibel NL, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of caspofungin in children and adolescents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4536-45.). Because of limited experience with both of these drugs in children, data are insufficient to recommend use of voriconazole or caspofungin for esophageal or disseminated candidiasis as first-line therapy (CIII). |
 | | Invasive disease |  | Central venous catheters should be removed when feasible in HIV-infected children with candidemia (AII) (267Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:900-6., 271Muller FM, Groll AH, Walsh TJ. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections in children infected with human immuno deficiency virus. Eur J Pediatr 1999;158:187-99.) Conventional amphotericin B (sodium deoxycholate complex) is the drug of choice for most invasive Candida infections in children, administered once daily intravenously over 1-2 hours (AI). In children who have azotemia or hyperkalemia or are receiving high doses (>1 mg/kg), a longer infusion time of 3-6 hours is recommended (BIII) (289Dismukes WE. Introduction to antifungal drugs. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:653-7.). In children with life-threatening disease, the target daily dose of amphotericin B should be administered from the beginning of therapy (BIII). Duration of therapy in treating candidemia should be determined by the presence of deep tissue foci, clinical response, and presence of neutropenia. Children at high risk for morbidity and mortality should be treated until 2-3 weeks after the last positive blood culture and until signs and symptoms of infection have resolved (AIII) (279Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:662-78.). Among children with persistent candidemia despite appropriate therapy, investigation for a deep tissue focus of infection should be conducted (e.g., echocardiogram, renal or abdominal ultrasound). Flucytosine has been used in combination with amphotericin B in some children with severe invasive candidiasis, particularly in those with CNS disease (CIII), but it has a narrow therapeutic index. Fluconazole has been used as an alternative to amphotericin B to treat invasive disease in children who have not recently received azole therapy (AI) (279Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:662-78.). Treatment of invasive candidiasis requires higher doses of fluconazole than are used for mucocutaneous disease. Alternatively, an initial course of amphotericin B therapy can be administered and then carefully followed by completion of a course of fluconazole therapy (BIII). Species identification is necessary when using fluconazole because of intrinsic drug resistance among certain Candida spp. (e.g., C. krusei and C. glabrata). Fluconazole administered to children at 12 mg/kg/day provides exposure similar to standard 400 mg daily dosing in adults. Clearance in older adolescents can be similar to adults, so dosing above 600 mg/day should be employed with caution (290Brammer KW, Coates PE. Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in pediatric patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994;13:325-9.). Antifungal agents in the echinocandin class, including caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, have been studied in adults with HIV infection, neutropenic children at risk for fungal infections, and children with documented candidiasis (258Merlin E, Galambrun C, Ribaud P, et al. Efficacy and safety of caspofungin therapy in children with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:1186-8., 291de Wet N, Llanos-Cuentas A, Suleiman J, et al. A randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group, dose-response study of micafungin compared with fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:842-9., 292Krause DS, Simjee AE, van Rensburg C, et al. A randomized, doubleblind trial of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:770-5., 293Villanueva A, Gotuzzo E, Arathoon EG, et al. A randomized doubleblind study of caspofungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Am J Med 2002;113:294-9., 294Odio CM, Araya R, Pinto LE, et al. Caspofungin therapy of neonates with invasive candidiasis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:1093-7., 295Seibel NL, Schwartz C, Arrieta A, et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:3317-24., 296Heresi GP, Gerstmann DR, Reed MD, et al. The pharmacokinetics and safety of micafungin, a novel echinocandin, in premature infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:1110-5.). Because of limited experience in children and no data in HIV-infected children, data are insufficient to recommend these drugs as first-line agents for invasive candidiasis in children (CIII). Data are limited on the use of caspofungin in children with systemic candidiasis. A retrospective report in which caspofungin was administered to 20 children aged ≤16 years who had invasive fungal infections (seven had invasive candidiasis) but not HIV infection, the drug was efficacious and well tolerated (258Merlin E, Galambrun C, Ribaud P, et al. Efficacy and safety of caspofungin therapy in children with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:1186-8.). In a study of 10 neonates with persistent and progressive candidiasis and unknown HIV status, caspofungin was reported to be an effective alternative therapy (294Odio CM, Araya R, Pinto LE, et al. Caspofungin therapy of neonates with invasive candidiasis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:1093-7.). Micafungin has been studied in HIV-uninfected, neutropenic children at risk for invasive fungal infections. This drug demonstrates dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and an inverse relation between age and clearance suggesting a need for increased dosage in the young child (295Seibel NL, Schwartz C, Arrieta A, et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:3317-24.). A study of 19 Japanese HIV-uninfected children aged ≤15 years who had confirmed invasive fungal infections, such as candidiasis, showed that plasma concentration of micafungin dosed at 3 mg/kg body weight was similar to that in adults administered 150 mg per dose (297Tabata K, Katashima M, Kawamura A, et al. Linear pharmacokinetics of micafungin and its active metabolites in Japanese pediatric patients with fungal infections. Biol Pharm Bull 2006;29:1706-11.). Micafungin was administered to premature infants receiving antifungal therapy for a suspected invasive fungal infection. Clearance of the drug in neonates was more than double that in older children and adults (296Heresi GP, Gerstmann DR, Reed MD, et al. The pharmacokinetics and safety of micafungin, a novel echinocandin, in premature infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:1110-5.). Dosages of 10-15 mg/kg/day have been studied in premature neonates, resulting in area-under-the-curve values consistent with an adult dosage of 100-150 mg/day. One pharmacokinetic study of anidulafungin in HIV-uninfected neutropenic children aged 2-17 years showed drug concentrations at 0.75 mg/kg per dose and 1.5 mg/kg per dose were similar to drug concentrations in adults with 50 mg per dose and 100 mg per dose, respectively (298Benjamin DK, Jr, Driscoll T, Seibel NL, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous anidulafungin in children with neutropenia at high risk for invasive fungal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:632-8.). Data in adults are limited on use of combination antifungal therapy for invasive candidal infections; combination amphotericin B and fluconazole resulted in more frequent clearance of Candida from the bloodstream but no difference in mortality (299Rex JH, Pappas PG, Karchmer AW, et al. A randomized and blinded multicenter trial of high-dose fluconazole plus placebo versus fluconazole plus amphotericin B as therapy for candidemia and its consequences in nonneutropenic subjects. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1221-8.). Data are insufficient to support the routine use of combination therapy in children with invasive candidiasis (DIII) (249Blyth CC, Palasanthiran P, O' Brien TA. Antifungal therapy in children with invasive fungal infections: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2007;119:772-84.). |
|
 | | Monitoring and Adverse Events, Including IRIS |  | No adverse effects have been reported with the use of oral nystatin for treatment of oral candidiasis, but bitter taste might contribute to poor adherence. The azole drugs have relatively low rates of toxicity, but because of their ability to inhibit the CYP450-dependent hepatic enzymes (ketoconazole has the strongest inhibitory effect) they can interact substantially with other drugs undergoing hepatic metabolism. These interactions can result in decreased plasma concentration of the azole because of increased metabolism induced by the coadministered drug or development of unexpected toxicity from the coadministered drug because of increased plasma concentrations secondary to azole-induced alterations in hepatic metabolism. The potential for drug interactions, particularly with antiretroviral drugs such as PIs, should be carefully evaluated before initiation of therapy (AIII). The most frequent adverse effects of the azole drugs are GI, including nausea and vomiting (10% - 40% of patients). Skin rash and pruritus might occur with all drugs; rare cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and alopecia have been reported with fluconazole therapy. All drugs are associated with asymptomatic increases in transaminases (1%-13% of patients) and, less frequently, hepatitis. Hematologic abnormalities have been reported with itraconazole, including thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Of the azoles, ketoconazole is associated with the highest frequency of side effects. Its use has been associated with endocrinologic abnormalities related to steroid metabolism, including adrenal insufficiency and gynecomastia, hemolytic anemia, and transaminitis. Dose-related, reversible visual changes (e.g., photophobia and blurry vision) have been reported in approximately 30% of patients receiving voriconazole (300Johnson LB, Kauffman CA. Voriconazole: a new triazole antifungal agent. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:630-7.). Cardiac arrhythmias and renal abnormalities including nephritis and acute tubular necrosis also have been reported with voriconazole use. Amphotericin B deoxycolate undergoes renal excretion as inactive drug. Adverse effects of amphotericin B are primarily nephrotoxicity, defined by substantial azotemia from glomerular damage, and can be accompanied by hypokalemia from tubular damage. Nephrotoxicity is exacerbated by use of concomitant nephrotoxic drugs. Permanent nephrotoxicity is related to cumulative dose. Nephrotoxicity can be ameliorated by hydration before amphotericin B infusion. Infusion-related fevers, chills, nausea, and vomiting occur less frequently in children than in adults. Onset occurs usually within 1-3 hours after the infusion is started, typical duration is <1 hour, and the febrile reactions tend to decrease in frequency over time. Pretreatment with acetaminophen or diphenhydramine might alleviate febrile reactions. Idiosyncratic reactions, such as hypotension, arrhythmias, and allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, occur less frequently. Hepatic toxicity, thrombophlebitis, anemia, and rarely neurotoxicity (manifested as confusion or delirium, hearing loss, blurred vision, or seizures) also can occur. In approximately 20% of children, lipid formulations of amphotericin B can cause acute, infusion-related reactions, including chest pain; dyspnea; hypoxia; severe pain in the abdomen, flank, or leg; or flushing and urticaria. Compared with infusion reactions with conventional amphotericin B, most (85%) of the reactions to the lipid formulations occur within the first 5 minutes after infusion and rapidly resolve with temporary interruption of the amphotericin B infusion and administration of IV diphenhydramine. Premedication with diphenhydramine can reduce the incidence of these reactions. Flucytosine has considerable toxicity: adverse effects on the bone marrow (e.g., anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia), liver, GI tract, kidney, and skin warrant monitoring of drug levels and dose adjustment to keep the level at 40-60 µg/mL. Drug levels should be monitored, especially in patients with renal impairment. High levels can result in bone marrow suppression. The drug should be avoided in children who have severe renal impairment (EIII). The echinocandins have an excellent safety profile. In a retrospective evaluation of 25 immunocompromised children who received caspofungin, the drug was well tolerated, although three patients had adverse events potentially related to the drug (hypokalemia in all three children, elevated bilirubin in two, and decreased hemoglobin and elevated alanine aminotransferase in one) (256Walsh TJ, Adamson PC, Seibel NL, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of caspofungin in children and adolescents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4536-45.). In this study, children weighing <50 kg received 0.8-1.6 mg/kg body weight daily, and those weighing >50 kg received the adult dosage. In the pharmacokinetic study of 39 children who received caspofungin at 50 mg/m2 body surface area/day, five (13%) patients experienced one or more drug-related clinical adverse events, including one patient each with fever, diarrhea, phlebitis, proteinuria, and transient extremity rash. Two patients reported one or more drug-related laboratory adverse events, including one patient each with hypokalemia and increased serum aspartate transaminase. None of the drug-related adverse events in this study were considered serious or led to discontinuation of caspofungin (256Walsh TJ, Adamson PC, Seibel NL, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of caspofungin in children and adolescents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4536-45.). IRIS associated with Candida infection has not been described in children. However, evidence suggests that candidiasis occurs with increased frequency in adults during the first 2 months after initiation of HAART, except for candidal eosophagitis (301Nacher M, Vantilcke V, Huber F, et al. Increased incidence of mucosal candidiasis after HAART initiation: a benign form of immune reconstitution disease? AIDS 2007;21:2534-6.). |
 | | Management of Treatment Failure |  |  | | Oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis |  | If OPC initially is treated topically, failure or relapse should be treated with oral fluconazole or itraconazole cyclodextrin oral solution (AI) (284Phillips P, de Beule K, Frechette G, et al. A double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole capsules for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1368-73., 302Groll AH, Wood L, Roden M, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cyclodextrin itraconazole in pediatric patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:2554-63.). Approximately 50%-60% of patients with fluconazolerefractory OPC and 80% of patients with fluconazolerefractory esophageal candidiasis will respond to itraconazole solution (AII) (303Phillips P, Zemcov J, Mahmood W, et al. Itraconazole cyclodextrin solution for fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis in AIDS: correlation of clinical response with in vitro susceptibility. AIDS 1996;10:1369-76., 304Fichtenbaum CJ, Powderly WG. Refractory mucosal candidiasis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:556-65.). Posaconazole is a second-generation orally bioavailable triazole that has been effective in HIV-infected adults with azole-refractory OPC or esophageal candidiasis (305Skiest D, Vazquez J, Anstead G, et al. Posaconazole for the treatment of azole-refractory oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis in subjects with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:607-14.). However, experience in children is limited, and an appropriate pediatric dosage has not been defined; thus data in children are insufficient to recommend its use in HIV-infected children (CIII) (306Zaoutis TE, Benjamin DK, Steinbach WJ. Antifungal treatment in pediatric patients. Drug Resist Updat 2005;8:235-45., 307Krishna G, Sansone-Parsons A, Martinho M, et al. Posaconazole plasma concentrations in juvenile patients with invasive fungal infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:812-8.). Amphotericin B oral suspension at 1 mL four times daily of a 100-mg/mL suspension sometimes has been effective among patients with OPC who do not respond to itraconazole solution; however, this product is not available in the United States (CIII) (304Fichtenbaum CJ, Powderly WG. Refractory mucosal candidiasis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:556-65.). Low-dose IV amphotericin B (0.3-0.5 mg/kg/day) has been effective in children with refractory OPC or esophageal candidiasis (BII) (279Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:662-78., 304Fichtenbaum CJ, Powderly WG. Refractory mucosal candidiasis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:556-65., 308Lake DE, Kunzweiler J, Beer M, et al. Fluconazole versus amphotericin B in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in cancer patients. Chemotherapy 1996;42:308-14., 309Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Pfaller MA. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:1-8.). Experience is limited with the use of echinocandins in the treatment of azole-refractory OPC or esophageal candidiasis in children (with or without HIV infection); however, given their excellent safety profile, the echinocandins (306Zaoutis TE, Benjamin DK, Steinbach WJ. Antifungal treatment in pediatric patients. Drug Resist Updat 2005;8:235-45.) could be considered for treatment of azole-refractory esophageal candidiasis (CIII). |
 | | Invasive disease |  | Amphotericin B lipid formulations have a role among children who are intolerant of amphotericin B, have disseminated candidal infection that is refractory to conventional amphotericin B, or are at high risk for nephrotoxicity because of preexisting renal disease or use of other nephrotoxic drugs (BII). Although lipid formulations appear to be at least as effective as conventional amphotericin B for treating serious fungal infections (310Walsh TJ, Whitcomb P, Piscitelli S, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex in children with hepatosplenic candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41:1944-8., 311Wiley JM, Seibel NL, Walsh TJ. Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B lipid complex in 548 children and adolescents with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24:167-74.), the drugs are considerably more expensive than conventional amphotericin B. Two lipid formulations are used: amphotericin B lipid complex and liposomal amphotericin B lipid complex. Experience with these preparations among children is limited (254Walsh TJ, Seibel NL, Arndt C, et al. Amphotericin B lipid complex in pediatric patients with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;18:702-8., 312Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:764-71. 108 MMWR September 4, 2009, 313Linden P, Lee L, Walsh TJ. Retrospective analysis of the dosage of amphotericin B lipid complex for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Pharmacotherapy 1999;19:1261-8.). For invasive candidiasis, amphotericin B lipid complex is administered as 5 mg/kg body weight intravenously once daily over 2 hours (254Walsh TJ, Seibel NL, Arndt C, et al. Amphotericin B lipid complex in pediatric patients with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;18:702-8., 312Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:764-71. 108 MMWR September 4, 2009, 314Tollemar J, Klingspor L, Ringdén O. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) for fungal infections in immunocompromised adults and children. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001;7(Suppl 2):68-79.). Amphotericin B liposome is administered intravenously as 3-5 mg/kg body weight once daily over 1-2 hours. Duration of therapy is based on clinical response; most patients are treated for at least 2-4 weeks. The role of the echinocandins in invasive candidiasis has not been well studied in HIV-infected children. However, invasive candidiasis associated with neutropenia in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation has been treated successfully with this class of antifungals. These agents should be considered in the treatment of invasive candidiasis but reserved as alternative, second-line therapy to currently available treatment modalities (CIII). |
|
 | | Prevention of Recurrence |  | Secondary prophylaxis of recurrent OPC usually is not recommended because 1) the treatment of recurrence is typically effective, 2) the potential exists for the development of resistance and drug interactions, and 3) additional rounds of prophylaxis are costly (DIII). Immune reconstitution with HAART in immunocompromised children should be a priority (AIII). However, if recurrences are severe, data on HIV-infected adults with advanced disease on HAART suggest that suppressive therapy with systemic azoles, either with oral fluconazole (BI) or with itraconazole solution (CI), can be considered (315Goldman M, Cloud GA, Wade KD, et al. A randomized study of the use of fluconazole in continuous versus episodic therapy in patients with advanced HIV infection and a history of oropharyngeal candidiasis: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 323/Mycoses Study Group Study 40. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:1473-80.). Potential azole resistance should be considered when long-term prophylaxis with azoles is considered. Data on HIV-infected adults suggest that, in children with fluconazole-refractory OPC or esophageal candidiasis who responded to voriconazole or posaconazole therapy or to echinocandins, continuing the effective drug as secondary prophylaxis can be considered because of high relapse rate until HAART produces immune reconstitution (CIII). |
 | | Prophylaxis to prevent recurrence of opportunistic infections, after chemotherapy for acute disease, among HIV-exposed and HIV-infected infants and children, United States*: Candida (esophageal) |  | | Preventive regimen |
|---|
Excerpted from Table 2 * Information in these guidelines might not represent FDA approval or FDA-approved labeling for products or indications. Specifically, the terms safeand effective might not be synonymous with the FDA-defined legal standards for product approval. Letters and roman numerals in parentheses after regimens indicate the strength of the recommendations
and the quality of evidence supporting it (see Box). Abbreviations: HIVhuman immunodeficiency virus; FDAFood and Drug Administration; PCPPneumocystis pneumonia; TMP-SMXtrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; HAARThighly active antiretroviral treatment; IVintravenous; IVIGintravenous immune globulin. §§ Pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine, and possibly atovaquone, confers protection against PCP as well as against toxoplasmosis. Although the clindamycin-plus-pyrimethamine or atovaquone-with/without-pyrimethamine regimens are recommended for adults, they have not been tested in children. However, these drugs are safe and are used for other infections in children. ¶ Substantial drug interactions might occur between rifabutin and protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. A specialist should be consulted. ** Antimicrobial prophylaxis should be chosen on the basis of microorganism identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. TMP-SMX, if used, should be administered daily. Health-care providers should be cautious about using antibiotics solely for this purpose because of the potential for development of drug-resistant microorganisms. IVIG might not provide additional benefit to children receiving daily TMP/SMX but might be considered for children who have recurrent bacterial infections despite TMP-SMX prophylaxis. Choice of antibiotic prophylaxis versus IVIG also should involve consideration of adherence, ease of IV access, and cost. If IVIG is used, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) IVIG (750 mg/kg body weight), not monoclonal RSV antibody, can be substituted for IVIG during the RSV season to provide broad anti-infective protection, if this product is available. | | Recommended as standard of care after completion of initial therapy | | Frequent or severe recurrences | Fluconazole, 3-6 mg/kg body weight(max 200 mg) orally daily (BI) | |
|
 | | Recommendations for treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-exposed and HIV-infected infants and children, United States*: Candidiasis |  | | Preferred therapies and duration | Alternative therapies | Other options or issues |
|---|
Excerpted from Table 4 * HIV=human immunodeficiency virus; PCP=Pneumocystis pneumonia; TB=tuberculosis; IV=intravenous; IV=intravenous; IM=intramuscularly; CSF=cerebrospinal fluid;CNS=central nervous system; TMP/SMX=trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; HAART=highly active antiretroviral therapy; CMV=cytomegalovirus. HBV=hepatitis B virus; HBeAg=hepatitis B e antigen; HCV=hepatitis C virus; IRIS=immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome; PCR=polymerase chain reaction; HSV=herpes simplex virus; HPV=human papillomavirus Information in these guidelines might not represent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval or approved labeling for products or indications. Specifically, the terms safe and effective might not be synonymous with the FDA-defined legal standards for product approval. Letters and roman numerals in parentheses after regimens indicate the strength of the recommendations and the quality of evidence supporting it (see Box). | | Fungal infections | Oropharyngeal disease:  |  | Fluconazole, 3-6 mg/kg body weight (max 400 mg/dose) orally once daily (AI) |  |
 |  | Itraconazole cyclodextrin oral solution, 2.5 mg/kg body weight orally twice daily (max 200 mg/day) (AI) |  |
 |  | Clotrimazole trouches, 10 mg troche orally 4 times daily (BII) |  |
 |  | Nystatin suspension: 4-6 mL orally 4 times daily; OR 1-2 200,000 U flavored pastilles orally 4-5 times daily (BII) |  |
Treatment duration: 7-14 days Esophageal disease:  |  | Fluconazole, 6 mg/kg body weight orally once on day 1, then 3-6 mg/kg body weight (max 400 mg/dose) orally once daily (AI) |  |
 |  | Itraconazole cyclodextrin oral solution, 2.5 mg/kg body weight orally twice daily or 5.0 mg/kg body weight orally once daily (AI) |  |
Treatment duration: minimum of 4-21 days
Invasive disease:  |  | Amphotericin B, 0.5-1.5 mg/kg body weight IV once daily (AI) |  |
Treatment duration: based on presence of deep tissue foci and clinical response; in patients with candidemia, treat until 2-3 wks after last by positive blood culture (AIII) | Oropharyngeal disease (fluconazolerefractory):  |  | Itraconazole cyclodextrin oral solution, 2.5 mg/kg body weight orally twice daily (max 200-400 mg/day) (AI) |  |
 |  | Amphotericin B oral suspension, 1 mL (100 mg/mL) orally 4 times daily (BII) |  |
Esophageal disease:  |  | Amphotericin B, 0.3-0.5 mg/kg body weight IV once daily (BII) |  |
Invasive disease:  |  | Fluconazole, 5-6 mg/kg body weight IV or orally twice daily (max 600 mg/day) for minimum 4 wks (if uncomplicated C. albicans candidemia) (AI) |  |
 |  | Lipid formulations of amphotericin B, 5 mg/kg body weight IV once daily (BII) |  |
 |  | Amphotericin B (according to preferred therapy dose) PLUS flucytosine, 100-150 mg/kg body weight orally divided into 4 doses for severe invasive disease, especially involving the CNS (CIII) |  |
| Itraconazole cyclodextrin oral solution should not be used interchangeably with itraconazole capsules. Itraconazole capsules are generally ineffective for treating esophageal disease (DII). Central venous catheters should be removed when feasible in HIV-infected children with fungemia (AII). Fluconazole should not be used for empiric treatment of fungemia because resistance of non-albicans Candida species to fluconazole has been reported (EIII). In uncomplicated catheter-associated C. albicans candidemia, an initial course of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole to complete treatment can be used (BIII). Amphotericin B initiation doses  |  | Mild to moderate disease: initiate at 0.25 - 0.5 mg/kg body weight IV once daily, then increase as tolerated to 0.5-1.5 mg/kg body weight IV once daily (BIII). |  |
 |  | Severe disease: initiate treatment at target daily dose (BIII). |  |
After stabilization and resolution of fever on daily therapy for children with invasive disease, amphotericin B can be administered as 1.5 mg/kg body weight IV once every other day (BIII). Lipid formulation of amphotericin B may be used in patients with renal insufficiency or infusion-related toxicity to amphotericin B (BII). Voriconazole has been used to treat esophageal candidiasis in a small number of immunocompromised children without HIV infection; because of limited experience in children, data are insufficient to recommend use of this drug for esophageal or disseminated candidiasis (CIII). Caspofungin has been used to treat esophageal and invasive candidiasis in adults; however, data in children are limited, and definitive pediatric dose has not been defined (CIII). Flucytosine dose should be adjusted to keep drug levels 40-60µg/mL. |
|
References | 1.
|  | Dankner WM, Lindsey JC, Levin MJ, et al. Correlates of opportunistic infections in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus managed before highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001;20:40-8. |  | | 3.
|  | Gona P, Van Dyke RB, Williams PL, et al. Incidence of opportunistic and other infections in HIV-infected children in the HAART era. JAMA 2006;296:292-300. |  | | 98.
|  | CDC. 1994 Revised classification system for human immunodeficiency virus infection in children less than 13 years of age. Official authorized addenda: human immunodeficiency virus infection codes and official guidelines for coding and reporting ICD-9-CM. MMWR 1994;43:1-19. |  | | 228.
|  | Leibovitz E, Rigaud M, Chandwani S, et al. Disseminated fungal infections in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991;10:888-94. |  | | 249.
|  | Blyth CC, Palasanthiran P, O' Brien TA. Antifungal therapy in children with invasive fungal infections: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2007;119:772-84. |  | | 251.
|  | Walsh TJ, Lutsar I, Driscoll T, et al. Voriconazole in the treatment of aspergillosis, scedosporiosis and other invasive fungal infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:240-8. |  | | 252.
|  | Scott LJ, Simpson D. Voriconazole: a review of its use in the management of invasive fungal infections. Drugs 2007;67:269-98. |  | | 253.
|  | Walsh TJ, Karlsson MO, Driscoll T, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous voriconazole in children after single- or multiple-dose administration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:2166-72. |  | | 254.
|  | Walsh TJ, Seibel NL, Arndt C, et al. Amphotericin B lipid complex in pediatric patients with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;18:702-8. |  | | 256.
|  | Walsh TJ, Adamson PC, Seibel NL, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of caspofungin in children and adolescents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:4536-45. |  | | 258.
|  | Merlin E, Galambrun C, Ribaud P, et al. Efficacy and safety of caspofungin therapy in children with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:1186-8. |  | | 266.
|  | Chiou CC, Groll AH, Gonzalez CE, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in pediatric acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: clinical manifestations and risk factors. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:729-34. |  | | 267.
|  | Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Roilides E, et al. Fungemia in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: new epidemiologic patterns, emerging pathogens, and improved outcome with antifungal therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:900-6. |  | | 268.
|  | Chiou CC, Groll AH, Mavrogiorgos N, et al. Esophageal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pediatric patients after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:388-92. |  | | 269.
|  | Gonzalez CE, Venzon D, Lee S, et al. Risk factors for fungemia in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:515-21. |  | | 270.
|  | Krcmery V, Augustinova A, Babelova O, et al. Fungal resistance in Cambodian children with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:470. |  | | 271.
|  | Muller FM, Groll AH, Walsh TJ. Current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections in children infected with human immuno deficiency virus. Eur J Pediatr 1999;158:187-99. |  | | 272.
|  | Stevens D. Diagnosis of fungal infections: current status. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002;49(Suppl 1):11-9. |  | | 273.
|  | Sigmundsdottir G, Larsson L, Wiebe T, et al. Clinical experience of urine D-arabinitol/L-arabinitol ratio in the early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in paediatric high risk populations. Scand J Infect Dis 2007;39:146-51. |  | | 274.
|  | Yeo SF, Huie S, Sofair AN, et al. Measurement of serum D-arabinitol/ creatinine ratios for initial diagnosis and for predicting outcome in an unselected, population-based sample of patients with Candida fungemia. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:3894-9. |  | | 275.
|  | Verduyn Lunel FM, Voss A, Kuijper EJ, et al. Detection of the Candida antigen mannan in cerebrospinal fluid specimens from patients suspected of having Candida meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:867-70. Vol. 58 / RR-11 Recommendations and Reports 107 |  | | 276.
|  | Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Alexander BD, Kett DH, et al. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the (1->3) beta-D-glucan assay as an aid to diagnosis of fungal infections in humans. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:654-9. |  | | 277.
|  | Klingspor L, Jalal S. Molecular detection and identification of Candida and Aspergillus spp. from clinical samples using real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:745-53. |  | | 278.
|  | Pienaar ED, Young T, Holmes H. Interventions for the prevention and management of oropharyngeal candidiasis associated with HIV infection in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006: July 19;3:C003940. |  | | 279.
|  | Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:662-78. |  | | 280.
|  | Pelletier R, Peter J, Antin C, et al. Emergence of resistance of Candida albicans to clotrimazole in human immunodeficiency virusinfected children: in vitro and clinical correlations. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1563-8. |  | | 281.
|  | Pons V, Greenspan D, Debruin M. Therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: a randomized, prospective multicenter study of oral fluconazole versus clotrimazole troches. The Multicenter Study Group. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1993;6:1311-6. |  | | 282.
|  | Pons V, Greenspan D, Lozada-Nur F, et al. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS: randomized comparison of fluconazole versus nystatin oral suspensions. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:1204-7. |  | | 283.
|  | Goins RA, Ascher D, Waecker N, et al. Comparison of fluconazole and nystatin oral suspensions for treatment of oral candidiasis in infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:1165-7. |  | | 284.
|  | Phillips P, de Beule K, Frechette G, et al. A double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole capsules for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1368-73. |  | | 285.
|  | Wilcox CM, Darouiche RO, Laine L, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole tablets in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. J infect Dis 1997;176:227-32. |  | | 286.
|  | Mora-Duarte J, Betts R, Rotstein C, et al. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:2020-9. |  | | 287.
|  | Walsh TJ. Echinocandins-an advance in the primary treatment of invasive candidiasis N Engl J Med 2002;347:2070-2. |  | | 288.
|  | Deresinski SC, Stevens DA. Caspofungin. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:1445-57. |  | | 289.
|  | Dismukes WE. Introduction to antifungal drugs. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:653-7. |  | | 290.
|  | Brammer KW, Coates PE. Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in pediatric patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1994;13:325-9. |  | | 291.
|  | de Wet N, Llanos-Cuentas A, Suleiman J, et al. A randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group, dose-response study of micafungin compared with fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:842-9. |  | | 292.
|  | Krause DS, Simjee AE, van Rensburg C, et al. A randomized, doubleblind trial of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:770-5. |  | | 293.
|  | Villanueva A, Gotuzzo E, Arathoon EG, et al. A randomized doubleblind study of caspofungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Am J Med 2002;113:294-9. |  | | 294.
|  | Odio CM, Araya R, Pinto LE, et al. Caspofungin therapy of neonates with invasive candidiasis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:1093-7. |  | | 295.
|  | Seibel NL, Schwartz C, Arrieta A, et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:3317-24. |  | | 296.
|  | Heresi GP, Gerstmann DR, Reed MD, et al. The pharmacokinetics and safety of micafungin, a novel echinocandin, in premature infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:1110-5. |  | | 297.
|  | Tabata K, Katashima M, Kawamura A, et al. Linear pharmacokinetics of micafungin and its active metabolites in Japanese pediatric patients with fungal infections. Biol Pharm Bull 2006;29:1706-11. |  | | 298.
|  | Benjamin DK, Jr, Driscoll T, Seibel NL, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous anidulafungin in children with neutropenia at high risk for invasive fungal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:632-8. |  | | 299.
|  | Rex JH, Pappas PG, Karchmer AW, et al. A randomized and blinded multicenter trial of high-dose fluconazole plus placebo versus fluconazole plus amphotericin B as therapy for candidemia and its consequences in nonneutropenic subjects. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1221-8. |  | | 300.
|  | Johnson LB, Kauffman CA. Voriconazole: a new triazole antifungal agent. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:630-7. |  | | 301.
|  | Nacher M, Vantilcke V, Huber F, et al. Increased incidence of mucosal candidiasis after HAART initiation: a benign form of immune reconstitution disease? AIDS 2007;21:2534-6. |  | | 302.
|  | Groll AH, Wood L, Roden M, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cyclodextrin itraconazole in pediatric patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:2554-63. |  | | 303.
|  | Phillips P, Zemcov J, Mahmood W, et al. Itraconazole cyclodextrin solution for fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis in AIDS: correlation of clinical response with in vitro susceptibility. AIDS 1996;10:1369-76. |  | | 304.
|  | Fichtenbaum CJ, Powderly WG. Refractory mucosal candidiasis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:556-65. |  | | 305.
|  | Skiest D, Vazquez J, Anstead G, et al. Posaconazole for the treatment of azole-refractory oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis in subjects with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:607-14. |  | | 306.
|  | Zaoutis TE, Benjamin DK, Steinbach WJ. Antifungal treatment in pediatric patients. Drug Resist Updat 2005;8:235-45. |  | | 307.
|  | Krishna G, Sansone-Parsons A, Martinho M, et al. Posaconazole plasma concentrations in juvenile patients with invasive fungal infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:812-8. |  | | 308.
|  | Lake DE, Kunzweiler J, Beer M, et al. Fluconazole versus amphotericin B in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in cancer patients. Chemotherapy 1996;42:308-14. |  | | 309.
|  | Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Pfaller MA. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:1-8. |  | | 310.
|  | Walsh TJ, Whitcomb P, Piscitelli S, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex in children with hepatosplenic candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41:1944-8. |  | | 311.
|  | Wiley JM, Seibel NL, Walsh TJ. Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B lipid complex in 548 children and adolescents with invasive fungal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24:167-74. |  | | 312.
|  | Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;340:764-71. 108 MMWR September 4, 2009 |  | | 313.
|  | Linden P, Lee L, Walsh TJ. Retrospective analysis of the dosage of amphotericin B lipid complex for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Pharmacotherapy 1999;19:1261-8. |  | | 314.
|  | Tollemar J, Klingspor L, Ringdén O. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) for fungal infections in immunocompromised adults and children. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001;7(Suppl 2):68-79. |  | | 315.
|  | Goldman M, Cloud GA, Wade KD, et al. A randomized study of the use of fluconazole in continuous versus episodic therapy in patients with advanced HIV infection and a history of oropharyngeal candidiasis: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 323/Mycoses Study Group Study 40. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:1473-80. |  |
 |
|
|